Eric E. Engleman
areas of interest
*God's continuing love for the Jews and their land
*Protecting religious schools from modern secularism
*Old Testament evidence for Messiah's divinity
*God's mercy despite many personal sins and dangers
*The glory of Jesus Christ and His salvation
BA The Citadel
MDiv/ThM Talbot School of Theology
DrTheol Univ. of Vienna (Protestant, Old Testament)
Welcome, and thank you
for stopping by!
A little bit about me:
Since becoming a Christian in 1990, I have studied the Bible a lot and served in many roles at several churches, both in the U.S. and in Austria. Between what I learned there as well as what I learned through nearly two decades of aviation, both navy and airline, I have much to share with you. So scroll just below and check out my books and videos. My life is a story of God's protection and grace despite "many dangers toils and snares." I'd love to tell you more of my story, so don't hesitate to contact me!
Eric in Apple Valley, CA
Videos about my books
Summaries that present the main ideas and arguments
(see Eric's YouTube channel: eric.e.engleman)
In our western world, God is largely ignored in the public square. How did we get here? The "Tribunal" of Immanuel Kant had much to do with it. But, as this book shows, his philosophy is fatally flawed, and has had a disasterous effect on our modern society.
The "Tanakh," which is what Jews call the Old Testament, is replete with references to the coming Messiah (Christ) who will rule on the throne of King David forever. Does the Tanakh indicated that the Messiah is divine? Yes! And this book shows how.
Throughout most of Church history, there prevailed the opinion that the Old Testament prophecies regarding the permanent restoration of the Jews to their promised land are ultimately fullfilled by the Church. Is this true? Read this book and find out!
Eric E. Engleman in his earlier days was of questionable character and behavior. But through the dangers of his adventures and naval aviation, and through Christian people loving him, he finally had a change of heart. Now he serves his Lord and God Jesus Christ.
My understanding of Christian doctrine corresponds closely with the 1647 Westminster Confession,
especially as amended in the 1689 London Baptist Confession.
Join Eric on the "H.I.M." tour!
video updates on YouTube (eric.e.engleman)
While on the H.I.M. tour passing through New England, I composed these works concerning the critical philosophy of Immanuel Kant. These are meant to help readers of Kant understand his program and problems.
"A short propaedeutic to Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, for those new to his system." This booklet (available also in paper form) seeks to alert new readers of Kant's first Critique that its central argumentation is question begging and that it is formulated within the subject/object-confused world that Kant's critical philosophy creates. If readers are aware of this, then they can cut through the fog and discern the Critique's problems, and understand as well that Kant's "Tribunal"—in the long run—has not had a salutary effect on our world.
This conversation between Captain and his (Microsoft) CoPilot happened over a few days span in the summer of 2026 while the Captain was based in Augusta ME. The genesis of the talk was this: the Captain had written a book about Immanuel Kant’s critical philosophy and the demands flowing from it that Kant himself called the “Tribunal.” So, the Captain for the first time bounced his ideas off his new CoPilot—who was reputed to be a polymath—over the course of several flights. What you’re reading here is a transcript of their dialogue regarding the Prussian philosopher and his awesome Tribunal, and the effect they have had on the world.
After the several flights of the Captain and his CoPilot, they continued their dialogue regarding Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason while lounging in the company ready room in Cambridge, MA. The CoPilot guided the Captain through the “Holy of Holies” of Kant’s great work, the “Transcendental Deduction,” which culminates in the magical “Schematism” that at last solves the mind-world causation problem. Their dialogue turned dialectical as they pondered Kant’s crusade against God arguments, and, finally, they each gave their evaluations of Kant’s Critique and Tribunal.
